From definition to evolution: the kinematics of Ψ(z)

Interpretational layer · no new models · direct consequence of definitions

This note shows that the evolution of Ψ(z) follows directly from its definition and the standard kinematics of FLRW cosmology. No additional assumptions are introduced.


1. Starting point

Define the diagnostic quantity:

\[\Psi(z) = \frac{H(z)}{H_\Lambda(z)} - 1,\]

where:

This definition is purely operational.


2. Change of variable

It is convenient to use:

\[x = \ln a,\]

so that derivatives describe evolution per logarithmic change of scale factor.


3. Evolution of H

In FLRW cosmology, the deceleration parameter is:

\[q = -\frac{\ddot a}{a H^2}.\]

From this definition, one obtains the identity:

\[\frac{dH}{dx} = -H(1+q).\]

The same holds for the reference model:

\[\frac{dH_\Lambda}{dx} = -H_\Lambda(1+q_\Lambda).\]

These relations are purely kinematical and follow from GR.


4. Differentiating Ψ

Differentiate:

\[\Psi = \frac{H}{H_\Lambda} - 1.\]

Using the quotient rule:

\[\frac{d\Psi}{dx} = \frac{1}{H_\Lambda}\frac{dH}{dx} - \frac{H}{H_\Lambda^2}\frac{dH_\Lambda}{dx}.\]

Substitute the expressions from Section 3:

\[\frac{d\Psi}{dx} = \frac{-H(1+q)}{H_\Lambda} - \frac{H}{H_\Lambda^2}\left[-H_\Lambda(1+q_\Lambda)\right].\]

5. Simplification

Simplify step by step:

\[\frac{d\Psi}{dx} = -\frac{H}{H_\Lambda}(1+q) + \frac{H}{H_\Lambda}(1+q_\Lambda).\]

Factor:

\[\frac{d\Psi}{dx} = \frac{H}{H_\Lambda}(q_\Lambda - q).\]

Using:

\[\frac{H}{H_\Lambda} = 1+\Psi,\]

we obtain:

\[\boxed{ \frac{d\Psi}{dx} = (1+\Psi)(q_\Lambda - q). }\]

6. Interpretation

This equation is not a model.

It is an identity that follows from:

It shows that:


7. Geometric form

Using:

\[K = -3H,\]

the same relation can be written as:

\[\Psi = \frac{K}{K_\Lambda} - 1,\]

which shows that Ψ measures relative deformation of the background geometry.


8. Minimal conclusion

The evolution of Ψ(z):


9. Diagnostic meaning

The equation

\[\frac{d\Psi}{d\ln a} = (1+\Psi)(q_\Lambda - q)\]

provides a closed, observable-level description of deviation.

It shifts the question from:

what causes acceleration?

to:

how does the observed trajectory differ from the reference one?


10. Scope

This result:


Conclusion

Ψ(z) is not an assumed field.

It is a derived coordinate whose evolution is fully determined by observable kinematics within standard GR.

No additional structure is required to obtain its dynamics.